home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Columbia Kermit
/
kermit.zip
/
newsgroups
/
misc.19970104-19970326
/
000229_news@columbia.edu _Thu Feb 13 12:55:50 1997.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2020-01-01
|
2KB
Return-Path: <news@columbia.edu>
Received: from newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.35.30])
by watsun.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA21662
for <kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 12:55:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from news@localhost)
by newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA06606
for kermit.misc@watsun; Thu, 13 Feb 1997 12:55:44 -0500 (EST)
Path: news.columbia.edu!panix!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!feed1.news.erols.com!cwix!uunet!in2.uu.net!199.172.136.10!news.ieee.org!europa.chnt.gtegsc.com!boingo.amil.jhu.edu!news.jhu.edu!news
From: murthy@eta.pha.jhu.edu
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Re: K95 for OS/2 == K95 for win95?
Date: 13 Feb 1997 13:40:04 GMT
Organization: The Johns Hopkins University
Lines: 25
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <5dv5jk$b6s@news.jhu.edu>
References: <01bc185c$70aa5440$d4a192cf@shade.hnv.com> <5dqouf$3lc$1@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu>
Reply-To: murthy@eta.pha.jhu.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.220.26.213
X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0
Xref: news.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:6570
In <5dqouf$3lc$1@apakabar.cc.columbia.edu>, fdc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu (Frank da Cruz) writes:
>In article <01bc185c$70aa5440$d4a192cf@shade.hnv.com>,
>Chris Kunath <cjk@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>: Do I understand correctly that the K95 v1.1.11 patch for my
>: K95 for Win95 will allow me to install the product under OS/2?
>:
>No, it will not. The OS/2 version is a totally separate product.
>It must be purchased and licensed separately, as indicated on the
>Web pages.
>
>- Frank
What I did not understand is why I should upgrade from CKermit (191).
The post from Christine had a lot of information but all I use kermit for is
to telnet into different unix machines.
It did not seem to me that a PM dialer is worth the cost. Please correct me
if there are other advantages I'm missing.
Thanks,
Jayant
Jayant
murthy@pha.jhu.edu